Reference: Proportion Ratios
Proportion ratios describe the shape of a cut without referencing absolute size. A 1-carat Round Brilliant and a 10-carat Round Brilliant should have the same proportions — just different scale.
Common ratios
| Ratio | Formula | Typical Range | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth / Width (D/W) | Depth ÷ Width | 58–65% | How deep the stone sits. Round Brilliant is 59–65%. Shallow cuts (50–58%) look flat; deep cuts (>65%) look narrow. |
| Table / Width (T/W) | Table diameter ÷ Width | 50–58% | The flat top as a percentage of the stone's width. Affects sparkle — too small looks sparse, too large looks dull. |
| Crown / Pavilion | Crown depth ÷ Pavilion depth | 0.7–1.0 | The ratio of the top to the bottom. Most brilliant cuts have slightly deeper pavilions (ratio 0.7–0.9). |
| Girdle / Width | Girdle thickness ÷ Width | 1–4% | The edge as a percentage of width. Thin girdles (<1%) are fragile; thick girdles (>4%) look heavy. |
| Pavilion Angle | (measured in degrees, not a ratio) | 30–45° | Depends on the material's critical angle. Diamond (crit. 24.4°) can go as shallow as 30°; Ruby (crit. 23.1°) similarly. Pavilion must be steeper than critical angle. |
| Crown Angle | (measured in degrees, not a ratio) | 20–45° | Typically shallower than pavilion. Controls how the crown catches light. |
Round Brilliant "ideal" proportions
These are classical benchmarks (some debated among cutters):
- Depth / Width: 59.3–61.0%
- Table / Width: 53–56%
- Crown angle: 34–35°
- Pavilion angle: 40.75–41.0°
- Girdle: 1.5–2.0%
- Culet: Small (less than 1%) or absent
Slight variations (±2%) don't significantly impact light return, but they're useful guides.
Why proportions matter
- Light return: Crown angles too shallow scatter light poorly; pavilion angles shallower than critical angle cause windowing.
- Durability: Thin girdles are fragile; thick girdles protect the edge but add weight.
- Aesthetics: Shallow stones (low D/W) look broad and flat; deep stones (high D/W) look narrow and sparkly.
- Yield: Deeper designs waste more rough; shallower designs fit into rough better.
Using proportions in GemDiagram
The Stone Report (Inspect panel) shows your design's ratios. Compare them against these benchmarks:
- If D/W is 50%, your stone is shallow — it'll look flat and bright.
- If D/W is 68%, your stone is deep — it'll look concentrated and sparkly.
- If T/W is 60%, your table is large — the look is open and spacious.
- If T/W is 45%, your table is small — the look is intricate and complex.
No single "best" ratio exists — it depends on material, design intent, and personal taste. But these ranges help you understand what your design will look like before cutting.
Material-specific notes
- Diamond: Can be shallower (pavilion 30°+) because its critical angle is lower. Can achieve higher light return with lower proportions.
- Ruby, Sapphire: Similar critical angles to Diamond. Proportions are similar.
- Quartz, Fluorite: Lower refractive index means shallower pavilions cause windowing more easily. Pavilion angles should be steeper.
See Refractive Index & Dispersion for critical angles by material.
Comparing cuts
Use these ratios to compare different designs:
- Round Brilliant A: D/W 61%, T/W 54%, Crown 35°, Pavilion 40.8°
- Round Brilliant B: D/W 59%, T/W 53%, Crown 35°, Pavilion 40.8°
Both are "ideal," but A is slightly deeper — A will look slightly more concentrated, B slightly broader.
References
For deeper dives, see:
- Faceting Workflow — how angle and distance work.
- Refractive Index & Dispersion — critical angles by material.
- The Stone Report in the Inspect panel — live proportions for your design.